Translate

Thursday, 4 December 2014

Women Secretly Filmed Showering On U.S. Navy Submarines Sparks Criminal Investigation: Report

Women Secretly Filmed Showering On U.S. Navy Submarines Sparks Criminal Investigation: Report

US Submarine sexual harassment

The U.S. Naval Criminal Investigation Service (NCIS) is investigating reports that female officers serving on submarines were secretly caught on video while showering, according to a report from the Navy Times
The publication says that women were recorded aboard the ballistic missile submarine USS Wyoming, and that a 24-year-old male, identified only by his rank of petty officer second class, was being investigated for allegedly making and circulating the videos.
The allegations emerged last month after an officer serving on another submarine received the videos, which show at least three women showering, the Times said.
In 2009, U.S. Navy Secretary Ray Mabus announced that for the first time in Navy history, women would be assigned to serve aboard U.S. submarines.
Female officers first served on ballistic missile submarines, including the Wyoming, and are scheduled to begin serving aboard U.S. fast-attack subs in January 2015, according to Stars and Stripes
Currently, females only serve as officers in the U.S. submarine fleet, but the Navy is aiming to integrate enlisted female personnel into the fleet by 2020, according to a separate Navy Times report
The U.S. military has had to contend with an epidemic of sexual assault and rape allegations in recent years, and the organization's treatment of the victims of these crimes has been widely criticized.
For example, a former U.S. Air Force chief prosecutor told Yahoo News that he was “outraged” by the military's handling of sexual assault cases, following the controversial decision of an Air Force general to overturn a sexual assault conviction against a leading officer.
In addition, Captain Wayne Brown, formerly the commander of the prestigious war ship USS Boxer, was relieved of his post after a report concluded that he had "lost the respect, trust and confidence of his subordinates" over improper behavior that included inappropriate touching of female colleagues, according to the Los Angeles Times
In another high-profile incident, Lt. Col. Jeffrey Krusinski, the Air Force officer who headed the service's Sexual Assault Prevention and Response program, was arrested and charged with sexual assault in May 2013. He was subsequently acquitted of the charges by a jury, according to the Washington Post
A legislative effort led by New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand to strip some military commanders of prosecutorial authority in sexual assault cases, which would instead be handed over to an independent body, was revived this week. A disparate group of senators took to the podium Tuesday to offer their support for the bill, according to the Military Times
Gillibrand recently pointed out that the military's most recent gender-relations survey from 2012 indicated that there had been 26,000 cases of sexual assault, rapes and unwanted sexual contact in that year, according to the New York Times
The senator added, however, that only 3,300 of them, roughly one in eight, were actually reported, as survivors feared retaliation from their commanders.
Defense Department research has shown that one out of three women in the armed forces has suffered a sexual assault, which is twice the rate for American civilian women.

Obama says China's Xi has consolidated power quickly, worrying neighbors

Obama says China's Xi has consolidated power quickly, worrying neighbors

Reuters
By Jeff Mason and Steve Holland
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President Barack Obama said on Wednesday that Chinese President Xi Jinping had consolidated power more quickly than any Chinese leader in decades, raising human rights concerns and worrying China's neighbors.
Obama, who met Xi last month in Beijing, told the Business Roundtable group of top U.S. chief executives that the Chinese leader had won respect in the short time since he had taken over.
"He has consolidated power faster and more comprehensively than probably anybody since Deng Xiaoping," Obama said, referring to the man who led China from 1978 to 1992.
"And everybody's been impressed by his ... clout inside of China after only a year and a half or two years."
But Obama said there were negative sides to Xi's rise.
"There are dangers in that. On issues of human rights, on issues of clamping down on dissent. He taps into a nationalism that worries his neighbors," Obama said, noting maritime disputes in the region.
"On the other hand, I think they have a very strong interest in maintaining good relations with the United States. And my visit was a demonstration of their interest in managing this relationship effectively."
Obama said the United States wants to show China that it wants a constructive "win-win" relationship while also insisting on fixing problems such as commercial cyber theft.
"It is indisputable that they engage in it, and it is a problem. And we push them hard on it."
Obama encouraged the chief executives to speak out when they were being "strong-armed" on those issues despite risks that their businesses could be penalized in China for doing so.
The president said he was confident the United States could manage its relationship with China in a way that was productive for the world.
He was less optimistic about Russia and President Vladimir Putin. The Russian leader, whose country is suffering from Western sanctions over its annexation of Crimea, was caught off guard by the situation in Ukraine.
"He has been improvising himself into a nationalist, backward-looking approach to Russian policy that is scaring the heck out of his neighbors and is badly damaging his economy," Obama said.
"The challenge is this is working for him politically inside of Russia, even though it is isolating Russia completely internationally."
(additional reporting by Roberta Rampton; Editing by David Gregorio)


Gun battle breaks out in Chechen capital, 9 dead

Gun battle breaks out in Chechen capital, 9 dead

 

21 minutes ago

GROZNY, Russia (AP) — A gun battle broke out early Thursday in the capital of Russia's North Caucasus republic of Chechnya, leaving at least three traffic police officers and six gunmen dead, authorities said. The fighting punctured the patina of stability ensured by years of heavy-handed rule by a Kremlin-appointed leader.
Security officials and the leader of Chechnya said militants traveling in several cars killed three traffic police at a checkpoint in the capital of the republic, Grozny. State news agency RIA-Novosti cited an unnamed law enforcement source as stating that five police officers were killed.
More than six hours after fighting broke out, Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov said a multi-story publishing house building the militants had occupied in central Grozny had been destroyed by fire and six of the gunmen had been killed.
He later said several other gunmen had been found in a city school and an operation was under way to "liquidate" them, the Interfax news agency quoted him as saying.
Although unrest is common across the North Caucasus, forceful security measures adopted by Kadyrov have spared Grozny significant violence for several years.
An Associated Press reporter saw the publishing house building in flames and heard the sound of heavy-caliber gunfire before dawn, several hours after the unrest erupted. The AP reporter also saw the body of someone in civilian clothing in the street near the publishing house as fighting was still ongoing, but it was not clear how and when the person had been killed.
The Moscow-based National Anti-Terrorist Committee, a federal agency, said in a statement that security services, police and emergency services personnel had surrounded the publishing house building. The agency also announced that it had imposed a counterterrorism regime on the center of Grozny. This officially allows heightened security measures to be enacted and the announcement typically indicates the imminent use of heavy force to quash unrest.
Life News, a news outlet believed to have links to Russian security services, cited law enforcement officials as saying about 15 people seized three cars late Wednesday in the village of Shalazhi and drove them to Grozny, some 50 kilometers (30 miles) away.
Kadyrov said on his Instagram account, a social media website he regularly uses to issue public statements, that the traffic police officers were shot dead as they attempted to stop the cars carrying the gunmen.
Kadyrov said the situation was calm and that all essential public services would still be operating, but he urged Grozny residents to exercise caution.
"I ask residents in areas where (security) operations are being carried out to abide by safety measures, and not to go out onto the streets without cause or to go near their windows," he wrote. "All the talk about the city being under the control of the military is absolutely false."
Kadyrov said in a message posted several hours later that six militants were killed in the standoff at the printing house.
"Not one bandit managed to get out. I directly ran the operation myself," he wrote.
Kadyrov posted a picture showing the lower half of an apparently dead gunman lying beside a rifle, but it was not immediately clear if it showed one of the presumed killed gunmen.
The Kavkaz Center website, which serves as a mouthpiece for Islamic militant groups operating in Russia's North Caucasus, carried a link to a video message by an individual claiming responsibility for the attacks unfolding Thursday morning. The man in the video claimed to be operating under orders from Chechen Islamist leader Aslan Byutukayev, known to his followers as Emir Khamzat.
The video could not immediately be verified.
A few years after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Chechnya was plunged into a full-scale war when separatist rebels pursued independence for the republic. The violence was largely confined to that small republic, but rebels ventured into other parts of Russia.
A fragile peace settlement was reached with Moscow until 1999, when an insurgency movement increasingly inspired by radical Islamist ideas reignited the conflict. A bloody military crackdown succeeded by years of aggressive rule by Kremlin-backed leader Kadyrov has quietened the region, pushing unrest to troubled neighboring provinces.
Kadyrov is widely denounced for human rights abuses, including allegations of killing opponents. He has also imposed some Islamic restrictions on the region, including mandatory public headscarves for women.

This Futuristic Armored Assault Wagon Is Russia's Answer To The Humvee

This Futuristic Armored Assault Wagon Is Russia's Answer To The Humvee

This Futuristic Armored Assault Wagon Is Russia's Answer To The Humvee
Although it looks like a low-end sci-fi movie prop, this could be Russia's version of the armored Humvee of the future. With drastically angled armor plating and a huge grill, Zil claims that this yet-to-be-named armored car has been commissioned by the Russian Army and will likely enter production soon. Yes, it looks like an agricultural tool from 2059, but that's exactly the kind of stuff Zil makes.
Zil, which is probably most famously known for their tractors and Soviet-era limousines used by the Communist Party's big wigs, has a lot riding on this new design. It's core business has been usurped by foreign manufactures, so Zil needs to go big or go home.
The Russian techno war wagon is said to be based on the chassis of a Humvee, although it seats many more people (10 in total), and sports disparate proportions. Zil claims the body was designed using "advanced 3D modeling," with a special emphasis on building a psychologically intimidating and "menacing" aesthetic.
The seating layout allows for firing positions both front, back, and towards the sides, with a series of clam-shell doors and a huge partitioned rear hatch out back. Even though this metallic beast looks futuristic, it's running on a leaf springs and drum brakes – a far cry from the super-capable suspensions seen on other next generation armored cars, such as Panhard's CRAB and IMI's Combat Guard. Power comes from a Cummins inline-4 diesel engine with 185bhp, transferred to all four wheels via a five speed manual gearbox and two speed transfer case.
This Zil creation's armor plating looks fairly thin and the seating and components inside looks like they came off of a 1980s Ford F150, Best Buy shelves circa 2001, and from a local bus station. Still, the rumor mill says this could be the vehicle of Russian armed forces in the near term, with multiple configurations in the works and supposedly a series of modular components that can be quickly added and removed.
It's not clear if this seemingly sparse armored car has anything to do with the similar looking 'Punisher' concept that was featured in some Russian special police promotional videos, like the one below. Apparently, that vehicle had a chassis based on the Kamaz 4X4 truck, a much more potent engine and far more advanced armor. Maybe Zil will flesh out its concept on the way to production with a new suspension, engine, drivetrain, interior, armor and, um, everything else I guess.

Wednesday, 3 December 2014

The Likely Pentagon Chief Who Wanted to Bomb North Korea

The Likely Pentagon Chief Who Wanted to Bomb North Korea

Ashton Carter, President Obama's expected pick to replace Chuck Hagel, is also known for being an academic and a behind-the-scenes kind of guy.

The job that seemingly nobody wants has somehow found its perfect fit. Ashton Carter, the former Deputy Secretary of Defense, appears to be the president's choice to replace Chuck Hagel at the Pentagon. While an announcement hasn't formally been made, a senior administration official said that Carter is expected to be named tomorrow.
So who is Ashton Carter? In addition to holding the top two positions at the Pentagon, Carter is known for being "an uber-wonk," a label bestowed upon himby Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey last year. And for good reason.


Despite his understated presence, many are pointing to his call to bomb North Korea as evidence of his mettle. Writing in Time in 2006 when he was out of government and teaching at Harvard, Carter and former defense secretary William Perry called on then-President George W. Bush to launch a "surgical strike" on a North Korean missile.In addition to having served as the defense department's weapon buyer and a lead budgeteer, as Defense News points out, Carter "received his doctorate in theoretical physics from Oxford in 1979, where he was a Rhodes Scholar."

For the U.S., the risk of inaction will prove far greater. The Pyongyang regime will view its stockpile of missiles and nuclear material as tipping the regional balance in its favor and providing a shield behind which it can pursue its interests with impunity. Worse, North Korea has a long history of selling its advanced weapons to countries in the Middle East, and it operates a black market in other forms of contraband.
It seems worth mentioning that he may have had a point. One year after the piece, Israel bombed a nuclear reactor being built in Syria with North Korea's help. Given what's currently happening, it's difficult to fathom what the region would look like now if Syria had successfully built a plutonium reactor.
But for a more characteristic piece from Carter's body of work, consider his measured "Running the Pentagon Right," a partisan treatise for Foreign Affairsthat matches criticisms of the Bush administrations approach to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq with sentences like "the Pentagon also needs to get better at identifying threats as early as possible. This does not mean war-gaming for five to ten years down the line—something the department currently does in its Quadrennial Defense Reviews."

Putin's Gas Deal With Turkey Is a Defeat

President Vladimir Putin is trying to turn defeat into victory, after Bulgaria's intransigence forced him to abandon the planned South Stream natural gas pipeline. Yesterday, Putin said he was scrapping the project in favor of an alternative route to Turkey. That should show those pesky Europeans he doesn't need their custom: Russia can still do business with other authoritarian regimes.
South Stream's purpose was to ship gas to Europe, bypassing Ukraine. This would have allowed Russia to wring political concessions from its rebellious southwestern neighbor by choking off its energy supply, without endangering lucrative contracts with European customers. Russia's state-controlled gas giant Gazprom currently has to pump gas across Ukrainian territory to meet those obligations, making it possible for Ukraine to siphon off Europe's gas whenever its own supplies are shut off.
The European Union has never liked the South Stream idea, not just because letting the Kremlin strangle Ukraine seemed unsavory but because strategically, Brussels wants less, not more dependence on Russian gas. It also doesn't want gas sellers to own pipeline infrastructure. Gazprom, however, is unwilling to operate in any other way.
The EU has warned countries that signed bilateral deals with Russia to build the pipeline -- Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Greece, Hungary and Slovenia -- that they would face fines if they went ahead with the project. It also told Serbia that letting South Stream cross its territory when it didn't comply with EU rules would hurt the country's efforts to join the bloc.
Hungary, under Putin ally Viktor Orban, loudly announced its defiance of the EU's directives. Still, even if Austria, Croatia, Greece, Serbia and Slovenia followed suit, the project could not go ahead without Bulgaria's consent: the EU's poorest member was to provide the pipeline, laid across the bottom of the Black Sea, with an entry point to Europe (see the red line on the map).
Baumgarten_short-2014-05
WWW.EEGAS.COM
In October, the center-right party GERB, led by Boiko Borisov, won Bulgaria's parliamentary election. Borisov enjoyed the support of Brussels because he said the pipeline would only be built with EU approval and no amount of cajoling by Moscow could swing him. Besides, Gazprom's partner in the project, Italy's oil and gas conglomerate ENI, was making dismayed noises about the pipeline's mounting costs. Although Gazprom has already spent $5 billion on South Stream, the project was beginning to look unfeasible, and Putin had to admit it. 
"Bearing in mind the fact that we have not yet received Bulgaria's permission, we think Russia in such conditions cannot continue this project," he told a press conference in Ankara. He then added sulkily: "If Europe doesn't want to realize this, then it means it won't be realized. We will redirect the flow of our energy resources to other regions of the world."
That, however, isn't what will happen. The pipeline to Turkey will use the infrastructure already built for South Stream and still deliver gas to Europe, only by a more circuitous route. According to Gazprom chief executive Alexei Miller, the pipeline's capacity will be 63 billion cubic meters of gas per year, the same as South Stream's target capacity. Turkey will buy 14 billion cubic meters of that, and send the rest to the Balkans. 
On the face of it, Putin is demonstrating Russia's resilience in the face of a stinging diplomatic defeat at the hands of Brussels. Announcing a deal with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, whose methods of governing and deeply conservative views are similar to Putin's, is a way of telling Europe and the U.S. that their attempts to isolate Russia are futile. In terms of geopolitical optics, strengthening that relationship is similar to sidling closer to China, with which Russia also signed a major gas deal this year. 
Turkey, however, doesn't have any freebies for Putin. Russia agreed to give the country a 6 percent discount on current natural gas supplies, which will cost Gazprom $700 million a year. Vladimir Milov, once a Russian deputy energy minister and now a Putin opponent, is apprehensive about the pipeline deal:
Turkey has long dreamed to concentrate all of Russia's transit streams, and now it has that opportunity. Turkey is a much tougher partner than Ukraine with its low transit tariffs. In fact, Turkey has always insisted on the role of a gas re-seller: 'We buy the Russian gas that goes across our land and we sell it on to Europe.'
Since the exact terms of the Turkish deal (or the Chinese one) have not been made public, Milov suspects Turkey will get its way. As Russian gas analyst Mikhail Korchemkin put it in a LiveJournal post: "The South Stream pipeline was meant to get rid of a transit country seen as a parasite in relation to the Russian economy. The new gas pipeline to Turkey will create a new parasite."
China is paying a relatively low price for Russian gas, and to make the pipeline project viable for Gazprom, Putin has exempted it from extraction and property taxes. The Turkish project is only likely to be borderline profitable, too. Using energy resources as a geopolitical tool severely limits Putin's business options. He is having to pay to show his teeth to Western adversaries, a risky strategy given Russia's shrinking financial opportunities. The only alternative, however, would be to back down in Ukraine, something Putin is loath to do.
To contact the author on this story:
Leonid Bershidsky at lbershidsky@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor on this story:
Marc Champion at mchampion7@bloomberg.net

Islamic State reportedly hijacked Egyptian missile boat near Suez; 8 Egyptian sailors still missing, Arab media says.

egypt navy
An investigation is under way in Egypt into a November 12 incident during which Islamic State fighters hijacked an Egyptian navy missile boat. The insurgents planned to then attack and hijack an Israeli ship and to use it as leverage for the release of Palestinian prisoners, Arab media reported Monday.

The hijacked ship departed from Damietta Port in northern Egypt. An Islamic State fighter replaced the boat’s intended captain by staging a car accident in which the latter was supposedly involved in. Islamic State fighters then hijacked the ship as it was departing from the canal, according to an Egyptian report.

The Egyptian navy began suspecting wrongdoings when the hijacked ship failed to identify itself.

Broadcasts from the boat later revealed the identity of the captain, tying him to Islamic State, and confirming the navy’s concerns.

Egypt sent out reinforcement boats to the scene, and the hijacked ship was neutralized after an exchange of fire. Eight of the ship’s sailors have been missing since.

Five soldiers were injured in the incident in addition to the eight soldiers declared missing, according to the Egyptian military.

Three Islamic State-captained boats attacked the missile ship off the shores of Damietta. The Egyptian navy, with the assistance of Egyptian air force helicopters, attacked the three boats and killed some Islamic State fighters and arrested 32 others, the military added.

“The Egyptian security forces are looking into the possibility that a foreign country gave logistical assistance to the Islamic State militants,” Egyptian military sources said.

Abu al-Insaari, a journalist acquainted with Islamic State, said that the hijackers were looking to achieve two goals: “To attack a ship transporting 200 Egyptian soldiers to northern Sinai, and to attack an Israeli ship in order to kidnap its crew for use as leverage in negotiations with Israel for the release of Palestinian prisoners.”

Eichmann’s final barb: ‘I hope that all of you will follow me’

Rafi Eitan, the Israeli intelligence officer who seized him in Argentina, tells TV documentary of Nazi war criminal’s last mumbled words before he was hanged


This 1961 file photo shows Adolf Eichmann standing in his glass cage in the Jerusalem courtroom where he was tried and convicted of war crimes committed during World War II.(photo credit: AP Photo,b/w file)

Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann’s last words, before he was hanged by Israel for war crimes, crimes against humanity and crimes against the Jewish people, were “I hope that all of you will follow me,” the Israeli intelligence officer who accompanied him to the gallows said.
Rafi Eitan, who had commanded the operation to capture Eichmann in Argentina in 1960, told an Israeli TV documentary broadcast on Monday night that he was standing behind Eichmann at the gallows, at Ramle jail in 1962. “I accompanied him to the hanging. I saw him from the back. I did not speak with him at that moment,” Eitan said.
Did Ecihmann say anything? The interviewer asked. “What he said was, ‘I hope that all of you will follow me’,” said Eitan.
That was what he mumbled before he was hanged? The interviewer asked. “Correct,” said Eitan.
Adolf Eichmann, on trial in 1961
Adolf Eichmann, on trial in 1961 (photo credit: Wikimedia Commons)
Adolf Eichmann, on trial in 1961 (photo credit: Wikimedia Commons)
Eichmann’s last words have generally been reported as having been: “Long live Germany. Long live Argentina. Long live Austria. These are the three countries with which I have been most connected and which I will not forget. I greet my wife, my family and my friends. I am ready. We’ll meet again soon, as is the fate of all men. I die believing in God.”
Eitan, speaking on the Uvda investigative news program on Israel’s Channel 2, described the task of capturing Eichmann in Argentina, operationally speaking, as “one of the easiest missions we did.”
He described the physical maneuver performed on Eichmann to twist him quickly into the back seat of the car in which he was taken to a Mossad safe house after being captured in Buenos Aires, and recalled the Nazi’s head resting on his knees in the silent car.
In the safe house, they stripped him naked, blinded his eyes, and checked to make sure he was not carrying poison on his body or in his mouth.
The Shin Bet interrogations officer assigned to the team, Zvi Aharoni, asked Eichmann once for his name, Eitan recalled, and was told Otto Henninger. He asked a second time and was told Ricardo Klement. The native German speaker then asked Eichmann for his SS number and was given the precise ID number. Then, Eitan said, Aharoni asked for his name again and he said, Adlolf Eichmann. “Immediately afterward he says, ‘May I have a glass of red wine,'” Eitan recalled.
Charged with washing and feeding Eichmann, Eitan said he found himself curious about the man’s capabilities and whether or not he was superior to him. “I found that I was his better,” Eitan said, noting that Eichmann was loyal to his new masters, adhering to all of the Israelis’ orders. “That would not have happened to me. If I was in his situation, that would not have happened to me.”

Former Mossad official and government minister Rafi Eitan (photo credit: Kobi Gideon/Flash90)
Former Mossad official and government minister Rafi Eitan (photo credit: Kobi Gideon/Flash90)
Former Mossad official and government minister Rafi Eitan (photo credit: Kobi Gideon/Flash90)
The TV program provided a look into the interior world of Eitan, formerly one of Israel’s top spy masters — an unrepentant man who deemed regret a “non-practical word” for which he, even at age 88, has no use.
Eitan, in a blue dress shirt and black Adidas sneakers, spoke of the first time he was asked to take a life for his country, in the mid-1940s. His officer chose him and another man to lay an ambush for the German – often pro-Nazi – Templers, who remained in pre-state Israel and to kill some of them in order to deter their co-religionists from returning to Palestine after the Second World War. Eitan, then 19, found the appropriate spot, stopped the carriage near the Jezreel Valley town of Alonei Abba, and quickly and randomly shot two men.
He said he remembered their faces well but neither now nor then felt any need to learn their names. “We did not feel any feeling of guilt,” he said. “On the contrary, we felt we were doing our duty as sons of the Jewish People.”
Eitan also revealed that he turned his back on US spy-for-Israel Jonathan Pollard, giving the order to bar Pollard from the Israeli Embassy in Washington DC in 1985 as Pollard attempted to enter and gain asylum. For all intents and purposes, he further divulged that former prime minister Shimon Peres and defense minister Yitzhak Rabin were well aware of the fact that Israel was running an agent within the US armed forces.
Asked whether the two Israeli leaders were aware of the spy’s actions prior to his capture, he said, after some deliberation, “of course.”
Pollard, a civilian intelligence analyst for the US Navy, passed reams of classified material to Israel from the summer of 1984 until November 1985. He has been serving a life sentence in US federal prison since 1987 and will be eligible for parole in November 2015.
Described by his wife Miriam as “destructively emotionally detached,” Eitan said in the TV interview that he felt no regret at the way the Pollard affair played out. Although it was he who gave the order “to throw him out” of the Israeli embassy on November 21, 1985, he said that he made his decision “in accordance with the interests of the state of Israel” and that anyone “who is in a role such as mine and decides otherwise, is mistaken.”
He further alleged that Pollard had an escape plan that he failed to execute – a suspect claim, since the American US Navy analyst was under tight surveillance – and that “the moment he decided to come to the embassy as he decided to come, he decided on his own that he was going to prison.”
That night he went to Peres and Rabin and told them that Pollard had been arrested. Pressed to express regret or to admit to a guilty conscience, Eitan told the interviewer Ben Shani, “look for that on other people. I’m built differently.”

Pollard was recruited by an up-and-coming Israel Air Force officer, Col. Aviem Sella, and run by Eitan.
Jonathan Pollard (photo credit: YouTube screenshot)
Jonathan Pollard (photo credit: YouTube screenshot)
He described the crucial moment when he learned that Pollard had fled to the embassy, bringing his FBI tail to the gate.
A call from the embassy’s encoded phone explained the predicament to Eitan. “What do you say to yourself then?” the interviewer asked Eitan.
“I don’t say anything [to myself],” he recalled. “I said right away: throw him out.”
According to the documentary, Eitan knew about Pollard’s impending arrest three days before it occurred, and informed the prime minister and defense minister that Pollard would soon be detained.
Peres, a 2012 recipient of the Medal of Freedom, the US’s highest civic award, is portrayed in Michael Bar-Zohar’s authorized biography as being “stricken by shock” upon Pollard’s capture, leaving the reader uncertain as to whether the cause for surprise was the capture or the espionage.
Visibly bemused, Eitan recalled in the TV interview that, “I said in advance, I take all of the responsibility on me. I gave the order. Only I gave the order. No one authorized me.”
That arrangement, he added, “solved the problem for the people of Israel.”

Child Holocaust Survivor Shares Harrowing Tales

Child Holocaust Survivor Shares Harrowing Tales

(Photo: German Federal Archives)

The most tragic chapter of the Jewish people’s – and the world’s – history, the Holocaust can never be forgotten. The Missourian brings us this piece on Sara Moses, who survived the Holocaust as a child, though her mother was one of the Nazis’ millions of victims. Ms. Moses reminds us all that “The silence speaks to the evil-doer … The silence says it’s OK. We approve of what you are doing, and to the victims, the silence says we don’t care about you” as she shares her harrowing story of loss and survival:
When Moses was just a year old, Hitler attacked her hometown of Pietrokov, Poland. It became the first Nazi-occupied Jewish ghetto in Poland.
Nazi troops seized the town’s synagogue, beat up worshippers and robbed the synagogue of its sacred artifacts.
It wasn’t long before Jewish people, called “illegals,” were not allowed to walk the streets of their town. Their homes were taken away and given to non-Jewish people.
As a little girl, Moses witnessed the brutal beatings of many fellow Jews in the streets.
“Is it any wonder that the very earliest memory I have of my childhood is one of me and my family living in fear and terror?” she asked the students.
Moses shared memories of her mother and the stories she would tell. When she was with her mother, she felt safe and secure.
She didn’t know it then, but it would be her well-developed imagination that would help her survive the horrors she had yet to face.
One day, Moses’ parents heard that Jewish women and children would be rounded up and taken from the ghetto. Not wanting to lose their only child, Moses’ parents smuggled her to a Christian friend’s home.
It was the last time she ever saw her mother. When it was safer to return to the ghetto, she was smuggled back in.
“When I got there, I couldn’t wait to be with my mother. When I ran to see her, I was told she was gone,” Moses said. “She was taken to the death camp Treblinka, where she was murdered in the gas chamber.”
Moses later learned that from the time that her mother and the other victims set foot off the train in Treblinka, to the time that their naked bodies were removed from the gas chamber, was less than three hours.
“Treblinka was one of the biggest and fastest killing machines of the Jewish people,” she said.
Not long after, Moses was separated from her father and put aboard a train with her aunt to the concentration camp in Ravensbruck. Starvation was rampant. There was an outbreak of scarlet fever.
“The youngest children, as usual, were the first to get sick and the first to die. I was one of the youngest sick children there and I was still alive,” she told students.
It was during roll call one morning, when Moses was outdoors in the cold, sick with scarlet fever and hunger pangs, when a Nazi guard took notice of her.
The guard, Moses said, couldn’t believe how much she looked like her own Aryan daughter. The guard secretly brought Moses food, giving her a chance other children weren’t afforded.
During the day, when adults were at slave labor, Moses took herself away from her surroundings to an imaginary world.
Moses spoke of singling out one of the crawling lice, imagining that she had “gone home to her mommy, where a wonderful dinner was waiting for her.”
“I didn’t have anything, but I had my hands, so I imagined that the nails of my fingers became faces. I gave each finger an individual face, name and personality,” she said. “My fingers, I imagined became my friends, my family, and in my imaginary world there were family members as I remembered them to hold me.”


Author: Stand For Israel | December 2, 2014

Ole Naiko speaks out on his share of escrow billions

Ole Naiko speaks out on his share of escrow billions

Dar es Salaam. Former Tanzania Investment Centre (TIC) executive director Emmanuel Ole Naiko yesterday said he was surprised to learn that he was among the beneficiaries of the Tegeta escrow billions.
Mr Ole Naiko was in the list of well-known public figures said to have received millions of shillings from Mr James Rugemalira, a former IPTL shareholder.
The Citizen also learnt yesterday from sources close to Mr Rugemalira that he was preparing to issue a public statement on his role in dishing out billions “left, right and centre”.
According to documents filed in the investigation of the Sh306 billion scam and also produced in Parliament by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), Mr Rugemalira gave away billions to top politicians, government officials and other individuals from his share of the escrow monies in suspect transactions from an account at Mkombozi Bank.
His company, VIP Engineering and Marketing, sold its 30 per cent shares in Independent Power Tanzania (IPTL) to Pan African Power (PAP) for $65 million (Sh129 billion), an amount Mr Rugemalira famously described as “just a few cents for tobacco.”
Efforts by The Citizen since last week to talk to some of the people said to have received a cut from the escrow cash, bore fruit yesterday when Mr Ole Naiko agreed to speak.
He said he had been taken aback by the news when it first began to emerge, but declared he had nothing to hide about the fact that he received the money. His account at Mkombozi was topped with Sh40.4 million from Mr Rugemalira.
He, however, told The Citizen that he did not know at first that there was such an amount in his account until he checked. “I rarely used this account and immediately I got notice of the deposit I went to inquire the source.
“I didn’t bother to ask any further questions because the person who had sent that money has been a long-time friend and I believed I didn’t have to ask where he got the money from,” said Mr Ole Naiko.
According to him, the money was deposited in March but he has kept an eye on it until now. “I am waiting to tell the truth to the investigation team that will be formed to unravel this escrow matter as proposed by Parliament,” said the former TIC chief who is now the Honorary Consul for Botswana in Tanzania.
He said there are people who don’t wish him well and are backing up a campaign to tarnish his image over the money. Asked on whether he will be ready to return the money, Mr Ole Naiko said he will give an answer to that to the team that will be formed to investigate them. “I will give the answer before a competent team that will come but for now I am waiting for any action which will be taken by the relevant authorities,” he said. Parliament recommended that all those who received the escrow money be made to refund it. As it was proceeds of a scandalous deal to rob taxpayer’s money.

US official confirms Iran is bombing Islamic State

US official confirms Iran is bombing Islamic State
Video appears to show Iranian air force F-4 Phantom jet pounding jihadi forces in Iraq.
A US official confirmed that Iranian jets are bombing targets of Islamic State group in Iraq, although the operation is not part of the ongoing United States-led coalition effort to help local militias defeat the jihadist extremists.
The admission came a day after the emergence of video footage that appeared to show an Iranian fighter jet striking targets in northern Iraq.
“We are aware of that,” the official told the Huffington Post on Monday, speaking on condition of anonymity. “I wouldn’t say we’re necessarily concerned with it — we kind of have our eyes on it.”
On November 30 Al-Jazeera published the grainy video, which showed what looked to be an F-4 Phantom jet on a bombing run near the town of Sa’adiya near the Iran-Iraq border. The video was later taken down.
The clip generated speculation among military pundits as to which air force the plane was from, as only two countries in the region still operate Phantom jets — Turkey and Iran.
Turkey has been reluctant to provide direct military support for the coalition against IS, even though the jihadists, who have conquered large areas of Iraq and Syria, have also been attacking towns in the Syrian-Turkish border region.
That left only Iran as the source of the jet, a speculation heightened by the location of the incident, so close to the Iranian border. The airstrike seemed to be in support of a joint operation by Iraqi military and Kurdish peshmerga forces to retake the towns of Sa’adiya and Jawlala on November 25 near the Iranian border. It was Iraq’s largest offensive against the terrorist group since June.
American-made F-4 Phantom aircraft have been in use in Iran since the 1960s, having been purchased from the US government by the Shah regime before the 1979 Islamic Revolution. The US Air Force decommissioned its Phantoms in the 1990s, as did the Israeli Air Force in 2004.

IHS Jane’s Defence Weekly identified the plane as most likely being Iranian and noted that recent weeks have seen increasing evidence of Iranian military equipment in the hands of Iraqi units.
The US official told the Huffington Post that the bombing took place in an area where coalition forces are not active, and that there were thus no expectations of any interaction between Iranian and allied aircraft.
In November The Wall Street Journal reported details of a letter sent by US President Barack Obama to Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in which the president suggested working together against the Islamic State terror group in exchange for a deal on Tehran’s nuclear program.
The West accuses Iran of seeking to develop nuclear weapons under the guise of a peaceful civilian energy program.
In September, Khamenei claimed he had rejected a private approach from the United States suggesting cooperation on the battlefield.

US officials have neither confirmed nor denied making a request in private, but US Secretary of State John Kerry said at the time that there was a role for Iran in the battle against the Islamic State.